Welcome to BlogNomic, a self-modifying game where changing the rules is a move. Players make blog posts proposing alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.

The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history, or join our Discord. New players are always welcome to join the game at any time.

Story Post: New Acronym: A_R_I_A (0 comments) Prompt: Fantasy Book Title

Prompt: Fantasy Book Title

Friday, July 11, 2025

Proposal: Without Fear or Favour

Add the following to the end of the rule Favorites:

For the purpose of matching Favorites to words, or for the purposes of restrictions on selecting Favorites by comparison to existing corpora, differences in pluralization, tense or grammatical aspect are considered to be irrelevant.

As a daily action, if they have not added any words to their Favorites that day, and if an official post other than a Backronym has been posted by any other Wordsmith or the Puzzler that day that includes a word from their Favorites in its title, a Wordsmith may make a Claim. A Claim is a post in the Story Posts category that details the word in their Favorites and the post that uses it in the title. Upon posting a Claim, the Wordsmith may gain 1 point for every word from their Favorites that was thus used. The Puzzler should then remove that word from that Wordsmith’s Favorites.

In the same rule, change the second item in the bulleted list to read:

That word is not in the Word Bank, and has not been used in the title of an official post in the current dynasty.

Expanding favourites out to proposals and CfJs, as the proposalnym meta is broader and gives more opportunities for an underpowered mechanic to work. Also bringing in one uncontroversial change from a proposal made by Bucky earlier in the dynasty.

Proposal: Assumptions Render Intentions Ambiguous

Add the following to the end of the rule The Threshold:

If an Endgame Acronym has been posted, and a number of Backronyms equal to at least half of quorum has been posted in response to it, and there are no open Backronyms, then the Acrogenerate action may not be undertaken and, if there is a single Wordsmith with the highest Points, that Wordsmith has achieved Victory.

 

Story Post: Alchemists Randomly Incinerating Apprentices

Some people thought wizarding school was tough, but it was a cakewalk compared to Alchemy Academy. When a young student named Kai becomes an apprentice in the Academy for the first time, they learn that the fine art and practice of alchemy is much more hazardous to one’s health than they realized. Kai would be lucky to finish next week alive, never mind finishing their first year with good grades! An award-winning YA fantasy novel.

Story Post: Autobiographical Ramblings of an Immortal Architect

See those ruins over there, the shattered, wind-worn cairns peeking from the tall prairie-grass? Let me tell you how I built those towers, some two thousand years ago, what conspired to bring them down, and why nobody’s asked me to remake them since.

Story Post: Angelic Recoveries of the Inner Abbeys

A lost masterpiece of 60s speculative fiction, blending vivid psychedelic imagery with an allegorical examination of Judeo-Christian eschatology. The author was a contemporary of Lewis and Tolkien.

Story Post: Astronauts Roaming Inside Adrastea

Astronauts, Ava and Jose visit one of Jupiter’s moons for their research for terraforming places to escape their dying home, Earth. At first, things are calm at the start but it starts to get more eery the more they roam the the inner depths of the landscape and core of itself until they find something new. Is it a creature, a society, a ruin of what once was? That’s what you have to read to find out.

Proposal: an Antidote for the Rather Incoherently Abandoned

Under the rule “The Threshold”, add a sentence at the end of the first line that mentions “Endgame Wordsmiths”:

The Endgame Wordsmiths list shall exist if and only if the game is either in a state of Endgame or the dynastic action “Endgame Transition” is being performed. While it exists, it shall be publicly tracked.

Also, to normalize the grammar, replace the one instance of “Endgame Wordsmith list” with “Endgame Wordsmiths list”.

I think this should be enough to clear up the orphan variable issue, since it will then have “a location in which it’s tracked”.

Proposal: [Building Blocks] Mentee-Mentor Mentorship

In “No Private Communications”; amend “A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but should keep their conversations away from discussing specific gameplay strategy. This rule’s restrictions on communication do not apply during an Interregnum. The restrictions in this rule on communication in non-blognomic-related media shall not be construed as to cause those media to be gamestate. ” into

A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but the mentor and the mentee should not pursue strategies that is based on the private information of the other party.

The restrictions on communication due to the Rule No Private Communication do not apply during an Interregnum.

this should be the final form.

in essence; i don’t believe that it is a good idea that mentors are blocked from talking about nomic strategies when NPC is active; especially when the whole idea of mentorships is to guide new players into nomic. does that create situations where the mentor may know some secret identities of the mentee; or can conspire something in the dark? yes; but when the whole rule is based on good sportsmanship (in the sense that if i were to really conspire and then later say ‘nuh-uh’; there’s not really much that is stopping me apart from the sense of being a good player w/in the community) i think it is better to give the leeway when there is a new player involved.

and; i’m really confused by the second part of this; until i read the proposal back then.

edit 1: reinstated the Interregnum loophole; i was parsing it as the limits of this applies only to mentor-mentee communicaion. i still don’t see the merit of arbitrarily construing the ruleset’s scope to be infinite (hypothetically; if there is a rule “Chiiika must work for 24 hours”; there is zero chance i work 24 hours.)

edit 2: removed references to a unnamed subrule.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Endgame Orphan Variable?

I feel like Endgame Wordsmiths is an orphan variable. There’s no mention of where it’s tracked. The only two references to it say “the Endgame Wordsmiths list”.

I’d propose a fix but I don’t have available Proposal slots.

Proposal: [Building Blocks] Putting the Mentor in the Mentorship

quick revise withdrawn by Chiiika.

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 08:59:42 UTC

In “No Private Communications”; amend “A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but should keep their conversations away from discussing specific gameplay strategy. This rule’s restrictions on communication do not apply during an Interregnum. The restrictions in this rule on communication in non-blognomic-related media shall not be construed as to cause those media to be gamestate. ” into

A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but the mentor and the mentee should not pursue strategies that is based on the private information of the other party.

In “No Private Communications”, add a new subrule with the following text:

This rule’s restrictions on communication do not apply during an Interregnum, even if this rule is active.

i want to experiment with this form of the proposal first; open to amending later on.

in essence; i don’t believe that it is a good idea that mentors are blocked from talking about nomic strategies when NPC is active; especially when the whole idea of mentorships is to guide new players into nomic. does that create situations where the mentor may know some secret identities of the mentee; or can conspire something in the dark? yes; but when the whole rule is based on good sportsmanship (in the sense that if i were to really conspire and then later say ‘nuh-uh’; there’s not really much that is stopping me apart from the sense of being a good player w/in the community) i think it is better to give the leeway when there is a new player involved.

and; i’m really confused by the second part of this; until i read the proposal back then.

edit 1: reinstated the Interregnum loophole; i was parsing it as the limits of this applies only to mentor-mentee communicaion. i still don’t see the merit of arbitrarily construing the ruleset’s scope to be infinite (hypothetically; if there is a rule “Chiiika must work for 24 hours”; there is zero chance i work 24 hours.)

Proposal: [Building Blocks] Releasing the Tapes

In the rule “No Private Communication”, replace the text “disclosing what information was discussed” with “containing a full transcript of the discussion”.

As Josh said, let’s not dance around the requirement. Either it’s the full text or it can be a generic summation.

Proposal: [Building Blocks] Putting the Mentee in the Mentorship

quick revise withdrawn by chiiika.

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 17:54:56 UTC

In “No Private Communications”; amend “A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but should keep their conversations away from discussing specific gameplay strategy. This rule’s restrictions on communication do not apply during an Interregnum. The restrictions in this rule on communication in non-blognomic-related media shall not be construed as to cause those media to be gamestate. ” into

A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but the mentor and the mentee should not pursue strategies that is based on the private information of the other party.

i want to experiment with this form of the proposal first; open to amending later on.

in essence; i don’t believe that it is a good idea that mentors are blocked from talking about nomic strategies when NPC is active; especially when the whole idea of mentorships is to guide new players into nomic. does that create situations where the mentor may know some secret identities of the mentee; or can conspire something in the dark? yes; but when the whole rule is based on good sportsmanship (in the sense that if i were to really conspire and then later say ‘nuh-uh’; there’s not really much that is stopping me apart from the sense of being a good player w/in the community) i think it is better to give the leeway when there is a new player involved.

and; i’m really confused by the second part of this; until i read the proposal back then.

Proposal: [Building Blocks] Plotting In The Backrooms

Withdrawn. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 08:17:12 UTC

In the rule “No Private Communication”, after the text “the Wordsmiths who were part of the conversation should make a post to the blog disclosing what information was discussed at their earliest convenience”, add the following text:

, including the details of what was discussed about dynastic gameplay or votable matters that affect the dynastic ruleset or gamestate

Please don’t take anything by the title. It’s just for fun. However, it seems to be important to clarify the level of detail required to be revealed.

No Private Communications disclosure

During a mentoring conversation with aria yesterday I inadvertently tripped over into a violation of the following prohibition in the rule No Private Communications:

A mentor and mentee may still privately converse with each other, but should keep their conversations away from discussing specific gameplay strategy.

In the conversation, aria asked me why I had voted as I had on Proposal: Remove Rewards for Better Merit and I outlined the gameplay considerations that went into determining my vote.

I believe that this compliantly meets the threshold of ‘disclosing what information was discussed’.

Call for Judgment: Pondering Core

failed 0-6 with 1 def resolving to neg; my bad - Chiiika.

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 17:37:03 UTC

Uphold Chiiika’s enactment of Reform of Recuperative Break Management at 10 Jul 2025 04:23:40 UTC.

Reform of Recuperative Break Management cannot be resolved into the Core Rules because it is missing the [Core] Tag; ref. https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=Ruleset#Tags.

Proposal: Nominal Yield

Reached quorum 8 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 08:15:31 UTC

If the current Acronym is RRBM and Trapdoorspyder isn’t idle, skip the rest of this proposal.

Repeal “Yielding”.

Remove both bullet points in the ruleset that read “Set every Wordsmith’s Status to Playing.”

Replace the phrase “Playing Wordsmith” with “Wordsmith” throughout the ruleset.

With Reform of Recuperative Break Management taking the reunidling window down to 48 hours, I don’t think we need this mechanic that was intended to allow 2-3 day breaks any more.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Proposal: Unfortunate Unidle Timing

Popular, 7-1 with 1 DEF and Puzzler voting FOR. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 00:53:03 UTC

In the rule “Scoring”, change the sentence

For each Wordsmith other than the Puzzler that did not post a Scoring to that Backronym, subtract 1 from that Wordsmith’s Points, to a minimum of 0, unless the author of that Backronym is that Wordsmith

to

For each Wordsmith other than the Puzzler that did not post a Scoring to that Backronym, subtract 1 from that Wordsmith’s Points, to a minimum of 0, unless the author of that Backronym is that Wordsmith or that Wordsmith was not a Wordsmith when the Backronym was posted

Don’t obligate people who start Wordsmithing mid-round to post scores during a potentially very short window.

Proposal: Reworking Redundancies, Building Media

Unpopular, 1-5 with reduced quorum due to Puzzler voting DEF. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 20:39:28 UTC

Remove the rule Buzzwords and any ruleset items that mention Buzzword or Buzzwords.

Add a new rule under Scoring, named Key Engagement Parameter; with the following text

The Key Engagement Parameter is a private English word tracked only by the Puzzler.

In Acrogenerate, after “Set the current Acrotype to be Secret, and then perform the Steps for that Acrotype, ignoring the result and repeating this step if the selected Acrotype is the same as the Acrotype selected in the most recent Acrogenerate before this one.” and in The Threshold, after “Perform the Steps listed in the table that are associated with the current Acrotype, in the order in which they are listed for that Acrotype.” add the following point:

- Generate a Key Engagement Parameter by randomly choosing a word from the EFF Wordlist that satisfies the following limitations; randomly choose again if it fails any of the limitation until a suitable word is found:
  - The first letter of the Key Engagement Parameter must be a letter that exist within the Acronym.
  - It must not exist within the Word Bank.

- Readying a Keynote Transmission by searching it’s definition on Cambridge Dictionary; randomly choosing one definition of the word if it has more than one definition; and replacing up to half of the words within that transmission with [bzzt]. The resultant string is the Keynote Transmission.

In Acrogenerate, replace “Make a Story Post with a title that starts with the text “New Acronym: ” followed by the value of Acronym.” with

Make a Story Post with a title that starts with the text “New Acronym: ” followed by the value of Acronym and the Keynote Transmission within the post.

In The Threshold, replace “Make a Story Post with a title that starts with the text “Endgame Acronym: ” followed by the value of Acronym.” with

Make a Story Post with a title that starts with the text “Endgame Acronym: ” followed by the value of Acronym and the Keynote Transmission within the post.

In Scoring, after the point “Calculate the median value among all of the recorded numbers of that Backronym, rounded down to the nearest integer, and add the result to the Points of the author of that Backronym, or twice the result if the state of the blog is Endgame. If no such numbers were recorded, use the value 4 instead. If this rounded value is 1, then the Backronym is considered a Flop and any later steps in this action that would award Points to the Backronym’s author are skipped.” add

If the title of the Backronym includes the Key Transmission Parameter and the Backronym is posted within 24 hours of the most recent Acrogenerate action; increase the Points of the author of that Backronym by 2 and increase the Coins of the author of that Backronym by 3.

From what I can see; the Buzzwords is like a bonus that no one hits. This is a bonus that you can potentially hit.

Story Post: Repulsive Renderer for Biohazardous Manifolds

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 03:32:29 UTC

As demands for increasingly lightweight and easy-to-wear space suits increase; we’re glad to announce the RRBM - by rendering a layer of hard magnetodynamic barrier that passes thru the user harmlessly; it seals the user from any biohazardous manifolds such as the vacuum of space; the sulfurous rain of Venus; or the dust on the Moon. The barrier fits your body; meaning that you can touch it and feel it but it wouldn’t stick to you. The system also include a jet propulsion device for maneuvering and air recycling module.

Story Post: Rapidly Rejuvenating Beakhead Missiles

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 03:28:41 UTC

Here at AriaMissiles™, we are known for our quality missiles. Every single one of them is beautifuly nanobot-printed, and you select a majestic animal from eons long past to be the beakhead. However, until now, the precious carvings would explode along with the missile. We have just implemented technology that will allow the beakhead to reform itself after detonation, leaving a permanent marker of your strength in the rubble.

Reactivate, Repaint, Bring in for Maintenance

Unidle Chiiika. Quorum raises to 6.

Proposal: Into Words

Popular, 9-0. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 20:37:26 UTC

In “Scoring”, replace “along with any flavor text” with:-

and (if the current Acronym is not RRBM) at least one word of flavor text

Requiring players to leave some kind of comment when making each scoring, in future rounds, rather than just the number.

aria to be mentored by Josh

aria to be mentored by Josh until the Sixth Dynasty of JonathanDark has ended and the date is past the 6th of August 2025.

Hello

Hi! I am new, and am requesting to be unidled.

o/

Wednesday, July 09, 2025

Story Post: Replicating Receptacle for Botanical Management

Adminned at 11 Jul 2025 00:29:25 UTC

Ever find yourself in need of quick and easy storage options when working in your home botanical lab? With our (patent pending) self replicating receptacles, now you can keep your work station neat and organized from the smallest sugar carrot to the largest chicken cabbage.

Warning, we are not responsible for any receptacle replication malfunctions. Use at own risk.

Proposal: Remove Rewards for Better Merit

Timed out, 4-4 with reduced quorum due to Puzzler voting DEF. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 20:36:41 UTC

In “Scoring” replace “For each Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym” with “For each Wordsmith other than the author of the Backronym that posted a Scoring to that Backronym”

Don’t think you should be able to actually change your score, but can still give yourself a score to hide which one is yours

Story Post: Roundworm Radar Beeping Machine

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 22:10:13 UTC

Are you a Druid looking for animal companions, then come on down to Weird Al’s DnD to grab yourself a Roundworm Radar Beeping Machine.

Weird Al’s DnD, where we put the strange in strangest and the odd in oddities.

Proposal: Reform of Recuperative Break Management

enacted 4-3 with 2 def resolved to for by Chiiika.

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 04:23:40 UTC

In the rule Idle Wordsmiths, change

unless the Wordsmith who would become Active has become Idle within the past 96 hours (4 days)

to

unless the Wordsmith who would become Active has become Idle within the past 48 hours (2 days)

Proposal: Pressure Release

Withdrawn. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 09 Jul 2025 11:12:05 UTC

In the rule “Scoring”, replace “a Scoring posted to it from every active Wordsmith other than it’s author” with “a Scoring posted to it from every active Playing Wordsmith other than it’s author” and replace “For each Wordsmith other than the Puzzler that did not post a Scoring” with “For each Playing Wordsmith other than the Puzzler that did not post a Scoring”

If a Wordsmith is Yielding, maybe we shouldn’t have to wait on them to post Scorings and penalize them for not Scoring other Wordsmiths’ Backronyms. Yes, they could just idle, but the point of Yielding over idling is the intention to continue playing, just not this particular Acronym round.

Story Post: Raccoon Radar Beeping Machine

Illegal, as “Raccoon” is already in The Word Bank

Adminned at 08 Jul 2025 14:20:13 UTC

Are you a Druid looking for animal companions, then come on down to Weird Al’s DnD to grab yourself a Raccoon Radar Beeping Machine. Weird Al’s DnD, where we put the strange in strangest and the odd in oddities.

Tuesday, July 08, 2025

Proposal: Reduced Report for Both Matching

Popular, 6-0. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 09 Jul 2025 11:10:17 UTC

In the rule “Scoring”, change

for each word in the title of that Backronym that includes all the letters of a Buzzword, text with that title word and the position of that Buzzword in the Buzzwords list

to

for each word in the title of that Backronym that includes all the letters of at least one Buzzword, text with that title word and the position of the first such Buzzword in the Buzzwords list

It’s quite possible for one word to super-match two different Buzzwords that contain similar letters, but the current rule assumes each Backronym word only triggers the information-granting clause on one buzzword, so this clarifies how the Puzzler’s supposed to handle it by using the Buzzword-list order.

Proposal: Favorite sine flectu

Withdrawn. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 08 Jul 2025 21:59:51 UTC

Add the following text to the end of the rule “Favorites”:

For the purpose of matching Favorites to words, differences in pluralization, tense or grammatical aspect are considered to be irrelevant, as is the difference between the positive, comparative and superlative forms of an adjective.

They should still work if someone adds an “s” or “ing” to the end.

Story Post: Retrospective Reconstructor for Bicultural Misunderstandings

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 21:55:06 UTC

Intended for high stakes corporate negotiations, our two-camera facial scanner with cutting-edge expression recognition technology and attached universal language model can determine both when one participant in a discussion offended or confused another to within a tenth of a second, as well as the specific vague communication or linguistic or cultural differences that led to it, within four minutes of the offense.

Proposal: Reduce Raven’s Byproduct on Membership

Popular, 5-1 with 1 DEF and Puzzler voting FOR. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 08 Jul 2025 21:58:07 UTC

In “scoring” replace “lowest number of points” with “second lowest number of points”

Giving people who still want to join now an outside chance at winning

Story Post: Rusty Robot Battle Monitor

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 21:47:19 UTC

The RRBM allows you to observe Rusty Robot Battles from a safe distance. Turns out we still haven’t cured tetanus in the future and so staying away from shrapnel benefits everyone.

Story Post: Reductive Radioactive Blast Missile

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 21:11:43 UTC

The ultimate in non-lethal solutions to war. Don’t kill your enemies - just shrink them! Guaranteed to scale down biological life forms to at least one-tenth their original size. CAUTION: Lingering radiation in the blast area will continue to produce effects for the next 10,000 years +/- 100 years. Subjects entering the blast area after detonation should wear appropriate shielding and spend no more than 3 days in the area.

Story Post: Repercussive Rocket Boot Modulator

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 20:56:51 UTC

Nothing will spoil your day more than a pair of rocket boots firing with different propulsive forces! Even the smallest of fuel miscalibrations can be uncomfortable on a long journey. Perfectly balanced at even the highest of speeds, this rapid-feedback manifold modulator fits either heelplate and will ensure that wherever you go, you will always be putting both feet forward!

Story Post: Regressive Retroviral Biotic Manufactory

Adminned at 10 Jul 2025 20:44:48 UTC

A plant that is used to devolve hostile organisms at the genetic level, such as removing antibiotic resistance in bacteria, eliminating animal-to-human transmission in viruses, or selectively de-inbreeding dog breeds.

Proposal: Readily Recognising the Backronym Matters

Reached quorum 4 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 08 Jul 2025 13:27:50 UTC

In “Scoring”, add a new bullet point after the first in the “may make a Scoring on a Backronym as long as all of the following are true” list:-

* No Backronym has been Closed since the most recent Acrogenerate action (if the Acrotype is Secret)

Before “Once a Backronym has been resolved”, add a new paragraph:-

If the Acronym is Secret, then an Open Backronym can only be resolved if every Open Backronym was either posted at least 48 hours ago, or has a Scoring posted to it from every active Wordsmith other than its author.

Removing the temptation for players to wait for early Secret Backronyms to resolve and have their author publicly identified, before using that information to cast (or change) a Score on a later one. This proposes that the Puzzler can’t start closing the Backronyms until all of them are closable, and that further Scores can’t be posted while he’s doing that.

Story Post: New Acronym: R_R_B_M

Prompt: Fictional Futuristic Device

Reminder that all Acrotypes will be Secret from here on out unless the rules are changed.

Sunday, July 06, 2025

Proposal: Endgame Unending

Popular, 6-0 with 1 DEF and Puzzler voting FOR. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 07 Jul 2025 17:47:45 UTC

In the rule “Acronym”, replace “If the result is less than or equal to the Threshold” with:-

If the result is less than or equal to the Threshold (or if the state of the blog is Endgame)

Patching the greater/less oversight in Keep Endgame Verdict Absolutely Nonrandom.

Saturday, July 05, 2025

Proposal: Secret Offshore Bank Accounts

Popular, 7-0. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 07 Jul 2025 12:28:59 UTC

If “Keeping Evasive View, Anonymous Neophite” was not enacted, enact it.

In the rule “The Word Bank”, remove the text “If the Acrotype is not Secret, then”.

In the same rule, just before the text “When a Wordsmith posts a Backronym” insert the text “If the Acrotype is not Secret, “.

In the rule “Acronym”, insert the following as the first step in the Acrogenerate atomic action:

* If the Acrotype is Secret, add all of the words in the title of every Backronym posted since the most recent Acrogenerate to The Word Bank, ignoring words that are already in The Word Bank.

 

During a Secret Acrotype, words don’t get added to The Word Bank until the start of the next Acrogenerate, allowing folks to still anonymously post Backronyms and adhere to the current Word Bank while eventually contributing their titles to the Word Bank for the next round.

Proposal: Secret Bank Accounts

Withdrawn. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 07 Jul 2025 12:27:31 UTC

If “Keeping Evasive View, Anonymous Neophite” was not enacted, enact it.

In the rule “The Word Bank”, remove the text “If the Acrotype is not Secret,”

Seems like there’s a fair number of people in favor of keeping the Acrotype Secret, but also keeping the Word Bank in play. Why not both?

Story Post: Kremlin: Eternally Vying for the Adoration of the Nation

Adminned at 07 Jul 2025 12:38:38 UTC

In Russian politics, to be loved is to be feared, and to win the national heart of the people is to rule with strength and indomitable will. Can you balance the ruthlessness of purging your political rivals with successfully managing one of the largest countries on earth to be the most beloved leader of the Russian people? A game of negotiation, resource management, and push-your-luck, for 2-5 players.

Friday, July 04, 2025

Story Post: Killer Expansion: Vampires Aliens Nuns

Adminned at 07 Jul 2025 12:37:24 UTC

In the newest expansion to the hit board game, Global Takeover, three new factions emerge, ready to claim the world for their own. Drain your opponent’s will as hungry vampires, abduct and probe you’re way to victory as invading aliens or spread godly fear as ruler wielding nuns.

Story Post: Knights of England: Vassals And Nobles

Adminned at 07 Jul 2025 12:35:22 UTC

Another exciting expansion in the classic tile laying game series.